Criteria
| DSC 4.0 | Storyboarding and Art of Deck Making |
| Credits | 10 credits |
| Mode of Training | Self-learning |
| Criteria to attain credits | Successfully clear the assessment phases |
| Final Assessment Format | Descriptive test in muLearn |
| Does the assessment require answer script submission | Yes |
| No of question paper sets available | 7 sets |
| Mode of score collation |
Program PoC to coordinate
|
| Assessment Duration | 5 working days |
| Passing Percentage | 70% |
Evaluation Rubrics & Weightage
Phase I
| No | Parameters | Description | Weightage | Max. Marks | Passing Marks |
| 1 | Checklist | Need to follow the entire checklist provided. One mark only if all checklist entries are GREEN | TRUE or FALSE | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | Empathy Map/ Meeting OBI | Empathy Map (2) – Need to provide a holistic view of the client – Make relevant assumptions – Has not used generic statements to depict client perspective Meeting OBI (2) – Detailed outcomes mapped out for the meetings – Targeted behaviours identified – Insights need to be actionable |
14.0% | 4 | 3 |
| 3 | Approach/Methodology | Need to be problem specific (not generic 5 steps methodology slide) If it is predictive problem – model development, model validation can be part of approach If it is prescriptive problem – impact measurement or test and learn can be part of approach |
13.0% | 4 | 3 |
| 4 | Executive Summary/muOBI | Need to create problem muOBI (not meeting muOBI) aligned to problem statement Can create executive summary slide (in addition to muOBI or instead of muOBI) in different format, but it should cover – Insights and Recommendations, Key Outcomes |
15.0% | 5 | 3 |
| 5 | Flow (Horizontal and Vertical) | Need to maintain horizontal flow to convey key messages in sequential order Ideal order – Problem Definition, Executive Summary, Solution Design/Approach, Analyses, Next Steps and Recommendations |
24.0% | 7 | 5 |
| 6 | Recommendations and Findings | Clear recommendations defined from the EDA and Insights generated Need to be very problem specific, and include relevant industry terminologies Analysis should NOT be restricted to Factor Map/Representation provided with the problem statement |
20.0% | 6 | 4 |
| 7 | Targeted Outcome | Need to answer Gap/Key Question of the problem statement Need to align with nature of analysis (DIPP) e.g. – If problem statement is improvement in existing models, then model output should be compared |
14.0% | 4 | 3 |
| Total | 100% | 30 | 21 |
Phase II
| No | Parameters | Description | Weightage | Max. Marks | Passing Marks |
| 1 | Adherence to Mu Sigma Guidelines | Need to follow Mu Sigma guidelines diligently. For example – 1. Color Scheme (2) 2. Font Styles and Bullet Styles (Primary, Secondary etc.) (4) 3. Slide Templates (Position of talking headers, length of talking headers, margins etc.) (6) |
40% | 12 | 9 |
| 2 | Industry/Problem Relevant Details | Need to use industry related metrics/jargons relevant to problems Should NOT use – ABC/XYZ, Category 1 etc. |
10% | 3 | 2 |
| 3 | Clarity of Message | Need to frame talking headers conveying key message(s), should not be only header Need to have crisp sentences/texts (not long paragraphs) with intelligent use of numbering/listing Need to differentiate findings, insights and recommendations clearly |
20% | 6 | 4 |
| 4 | Effective Visualization | Need to use relevant chart types Need to position all content efficiently Need to use slide real-estate effectively |
20% | 6 | 4 |
| 5 | Overall Effectiveness and Targeted Outcomes | Need to have easy-to-understand flow Need to address gap/key question mentioned in the problem statement |
10% | 3 | 2 |
| Total | 100% | 30 | 21 |